Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
Collaborator
|
Although AI is rapidly developing and evolving, at the current stage of AI development, I agree with your decision. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We are seeing an uptick of AI-aided PRs submitted to UltraPlot. While I have no issue with the use of AI per se, I am a bit concerned that it will not help flow through from novice to more adapt for people who do want to get involved. The issues marked as "Good first issue" are designed for others to pick-up. These are usually lower in complexity and are genuinely intended for people to pick up as they are small enough in scope. However, if we let AI execute on them, the aim is gone: people won't get familiar with the codebase, but the issue does get fixed.
I therefore think it is time to get an AI explicit policy going.